NFU: Not For You, Soldiers!
- Ambreen Zaidi
- 3 days ago
- 2 min read
Sorry, my dear soldiers.
For nearly two decades, India’s uniformed services have been asking a simple question: are they part of the same system that rewards other Group A officers with automatic financial progression when their civilian counterparts move ahead or not?
Last week, the Ministry of Defence answered.
In an affidavit before the Supreme Court of India, a high-level committee cited “implementation complexities, legal complications, and financial implications” to deny Non-Functional Upgradation (NFU) to the Armed Forces.
Stripped of bureaucratic cushioning, the message is blunt: NFU is Not For You.
Not for the officer posted in Siachen while his civilian peer moves up on schedule. Not for the pilot flying operational sorties while her counterpart rises through file work. Not for the naval officer deployed for months at sea while others progress without comparable disruption or risk. The heartbreak is everywhere across ranks, across years of service from those still in uniform to those who once wore it with pride. And it’s not is not about money, it is the quiet realisation that, when it mattered most, the Armed Forces were not truly stood up for.
NFU was introduced after the 6th Central Pay Commission to address stagnation in civilian services. Most Group A services received it. Even civilian cadres within defence support structures benefit from it.
The Armed Forces do not.
This, despite operating within one of the most unforgiving pyramidal hierarchies in government, where promotions are structurally limited, not performance-deficient. The 7th Central Pay Commission itself acknowledged that such disparities affect morale and status. Parliamentary committees have echoed similar concerns.
Yet, the policy stands.
Years of litigation have yielded little beyond adjournments and appeals. Tribunal rulings, court observations, and institutional acknowledgements have not translated into resolution. Instead, the system continues to contest its own soldiers.
And now, the familiar refrain: refer it to the 8th Central Pay Commission.
Delay, institutionalised.
The 6th deferred it. The 7th did the same. Now the 8th inherits it, perhaps only to pass it forward again. In the meantime, careers plateau early, inequities deepen, and the gap between acknowledgment and action widens.
The question is no longer whether this can be done. It is whether there is the will to do it.
If nearly every arm of the state can implement NFU, why are the Indian Armed Forces, the only exception ?
Because what policy fails to recognise, society slowly stops seeing too. And in the armed forces, perception is never a small matter, it quietly shapes the morale of those who serve.
The message has now been formally articulated, documented, and placed before the nation’s highest court.
NFU is not for you.
And perhaps, years from now, when a younger officer asks the same question his senior once asked, he will be handed the same file, the same neatly typed lines, the same carefully chosen words, the same silence dressed up as a reply. Because policies, in the end, do not just decide what a soldier earns. They decide who the nation chooses to stand behind, and who it quietly learns to walk past.
Sorry my dear soldiers. Its not you. Not this time.
Jai Hind
Mrs Zaidi, NFU has become an emotional issue with hardly anybody understanding the nitty gritties of implementation. Yes, Defence officers deserve NFU but No, it will hardly do them much good; their aspirations will remain unmet. What Defence officers deserve is a bespoke scheme for their cadre which delinks Grade Pay from ranks and links it to length of service. Pl mull over it.
The Govt can get out of this issue by accepting a running pay band with yearly increments based on years of service instead of Rank. Ranks are meant for administrativeconvenience. Rank pay and Command allowance may be given in addition. MSP be added to basic pay and merged for all allowances.
Its more of an emotional thing rather than facts.
The fact is its allready there for Maj Gen and above, may be thats why,Its denied to middle level officers.
Divide n rule policy applied candidly by the babus supported by politicians against its own force.
The last baston of the nation may not be effective everytime everywhere...!!!
Thank you for writing.
While NFU might feel like an 'insider only' term right now, I look forward to the day its true meaning is recognized by everyone.
Thanks Mrs Ambreen Zaidi.
Verbatim / Near-Verbatim Extract (most commonly cited):
In April 1971, when Prime Minister Indira Gandhi wanted immediate military action against Pakistan, Gen Sam Manekshaw (then COAS) firmly told her that the Army was not ready.
He said:
“If you want me to do this now, Prime Minister, I guarantee you 100% defeat.”
He explained the impending monsoon, logistical issues, and the need for proper preparation.
When the Prime Minister became upset and the atmosphere became tense, Manekshaw responded with characteristic moral courage:
“Prime Minister, before you speak, do you wish me to send in my resignation on grounds of health, mental or physical?”
Late Mrs Indira Gandhi eventually accepted his advice and gave him the time…